Blade Runner 2049 (2017)


Starring: Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford, Jared Leto, Ana de Armas, Mackenzie Davis, Sylvia Hoeks, Robin Wright
Plot: A young blade runner’s discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down former blade runner Rick Deckard, who’s been missing for thirty years (IMDB.com).

Rating: 6/10

Overall: I have not seen the previous films of the Blade Runner franchise, but since I saw this one was getting high praise, it shouldn’t matter. Long story short, it does matter – for a couple of reasons. Perhaps I’m wrong, but I feel like i needed more of a back story despite the long paragraph intro (which I might add that I hate – either add a narrator or SHOW it). My other complaint is that I felt like the movie dragged for an eternity trying to get to the main point of the film and then backtracked just to set it up for a sequel, which makes me angry as a viewer because I feel as if I just wasted three hours of my life watching a film that took 2 hours just to make a point, just to have 10 minutes of maybe 30-second fight sequences, just to leave us with an open ending and a bajillion questions. I can’t say I will see whatever is to come next in this franchise, and I honestly can’t say that I will even go back and watch the others. My other problem was that it was hard for me to really grasp the whole concept of the “divide” between the replicants, the older robot things (I forgot what they’re called – or are the older ones called replicants? I don’t even care at this point…) and the humans. I feel like it had a Terminator meets iRobot meets Chappie vibe to it. It’s an overrated plot, and while the concept has potential to be interesting, I feel it took the overrated, “Hollywood” path.

Advertisements

Kingsman: The Golden Circle (2017)


Starring: Colin Firth, Taron Egerton, Julianne Moore, Mark Strong, Halle Berry, Elton John, Channing Tatum, Jeff Bridges, Edward Holcroft

Plot: When their headquarters are destroyed and the world is held hostage, the Kingsman’s journey leads them to the discovery of an allied spy organization in the US. These two elite secret organizations must band together to defeat a common enemy (IMDB.com).

Rating: 9/10

Overall: Still has the great humor and action sequences as the first film, though I don’t think it was as good. It was interesting how the writers found a way to bring back Harry (Firth), so it was cool to have him come back. I think the only complaints I have are the CGI stuff for the action sequences – it’s almost overdone. I also think there were some very weak points in the plot. As always I feel like writers these days don’t really question their plots or look for loopholes/loose ends.

On a side note, it was a fun date night film to see, especially when the first one was also your first movie date with your significant other 🙂

mother! (2017)

Starring: Jennifer Lawrence, Javier Bardem, Michelle Pfeiffer, Ed Harris

Plot: A couple’s relationship is tested when uninvited guests arrive at their home, disrupting their tranquil existence (IMDB.com).

Rating: 0/10

Overall: I can’t even begin to describe this film. It’s misleading, disturbing (not in a good way), and blatantly false. It is one of THE worst films I’ve ever seen. I had watched a couple of interviews of Darren Aronofsky and Jennifer Lawrence talking about what the film represents from an extreme metaphorical stance, but after watching it and reading the interpretations of what certain people and things were supposed to represent, it’s disturbing in the way that Aronofsky interprets religious, political and societal issues — some of which are the foundations to many Christian religions. One could argue that it’s a literal interpretation of those issues, but I think it tanked. I gave it zero stars because honestly, I didn’t even want to see it. I only went because someone else paid for my ticket and I was able to spend time with family and friends. For those of you thinking it’s a thriller/mystery — it’s not. It’s a giant metaphor that quite literally depicts certain aspects of Mother Nature/earth, communion/Catholicism and gender roles. Also don’t recommend for those who are rooted strongly in their religion or extreme feminists.

On a side note, this might sound harsh, but I wouldn’t be shocked if Aronofsky single-handedly ruins Jennifer Lawrence’s career in film.

IT (2017)

It_(2017)_logo-1.jpg

Starring: Jaeden Lieberher, Jeremy Ray Taylor, Sophia Lillis, Finn Wolfhard, Chosen Jacobs, Jack Dylan Grazer, Wyatt Oleff, Bill Skargard, Jackson Robert Scott

Plot: Based on Stephen King’s 1986 novel, the story follows the disappearance of children  who discover a supernatural experience revolving around a clown named Pennywise, who forces them to face their personal phobias in the process.

Rating: 8/10

Overall: So…I’ve never seen the original and I haven’t read the book. With that being said, I heard from multiple sources that the original film wasn’t scary, and being someone who doesn’t scare too easily, I went in with that expectation: that it won’t be too scary. However, with a phobia of clowns but a love for being scared — this film does a great job of catapulting you into the mother of all nightmares. I never understood why there was fear of sewer drains and red balloons, and now it all makes sense. I thought the film was great (at least for the parts I kept my eyes open for HAHA!). My biggest issue with the film is essentially the ending and the actual concept of “IT”. I think in a sense its ingenious. But at the same time, I find it has a lot of downfalls and is rather a letdown. So from a writing standpoint, I think it’s a failure. From a film, emotional and overall entertainment perspective, I think it’s brilliant (and traumatizing). In fact, I didn’t even want to write this review purely for the fear of what sorts of movie posters will pop up in the Google search.

The Hitman’s Bodyguard (2017)

The-Hitmans-Bodyguard-2017-movie-poster.jpg

Starring: Ryan Reynolds, Samuel L. Jackson, Penelope Cruz, Elodie Yung, Gary Oldman

Plot: The world’s top bodyguard gets a new client, a hit man who must testify at the International Court of Justice. They must put their differences aside and work together to make it to the trial on time (IMDB.com).

Rating: 8/10

Overall: I definitely think this movie was a bit over-hyped than it should’ve been. However, with that being said, I still found it to be satisfyingly hilarious and action-packed. I think the greatest downfall of this movie (like most action-comedies) is the corny underlying love storyline. It takes away from the action and comedy of the film. The only other complaint I have is the very anti-climatic plot the entire film is based around. I feel like I’m nitpicking this film, but for something that had so much hype, I think it could’ve been executed a little better than it was. Overall, I’d recommend it — I suppose my expectations were a little higher than I expected.

Baby Driver (2017)

1.jpg
Starring: Ansel Elgort, Kevin Spacey, Jamie Foxx, Jon Hamm, Eiza Gonzalez, Lily James
Plot: After working to pay back a debt to a crime boss, Baby, a talented young escape driver is coerced to partake in one last heist that places his newfound love for a diner waitress, Debora, on the line. He risks everything to salvage a normal life with her.
Rating: 7/10
Overall: I wanted more. That sounds greedy, but as someone who, as a viewer, wants to be entertained, and as a writer, wants well developed characters and plots – I wanted more. The action was great and to some extent, this film bears some similarities to the 2011 film, “Drive” (featuring Ryan Gosling). I think from a simplistic standpoint, I’d say that this film was satisfactory. I wanted to know more about Baby. I wanted to know more about Debora. I wanted to know more about Doc. I think for the time devoted to developing the characters, they do an OK job, but as always, I want to know more. I think the most irritating question I had was, “Where the heck did Baby learn to drive like that?” It’s a question that lingers all throughout the film and leaves you dissatisfied at the end. Also, I wanted to know more about Joseph – Baby’s “foster parent” who is deaf (which seems sort of symbolic in some way that I can’t quite figure out because Baby has a problem with his ear post-accident). There are just so many lingering questions and I think that was the biggest pitfall of this film. Great performances by the cast and lots of action sequences. But it was hard to truly root for people when you can never truly grasp the full potential the character has to offer. I liked the dynamic of Buddy and Darling duo – I wanted to know more about them (aside from the assumptions Bats lays out at the diner). We don’t learn much about Debora, except her love for music, which is what sparks the interest of Baby to begin with. I thought it was a cute and refreshing take on it – sort of 80s-esque. Not disappointing, but not satisfying. I’m a huge fan of the cast – so ultimately, yes, if you don’t care about character development and an overrated/predictable plot (AKA you just want the action and humor), I’d definitely recommend this film.

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (2017)

MV5BMTYyMTcxNzc5M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTg2ODE2MTI@._V1_UY1200_CR90,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg

Starring: Johnny Depp, Javier Bardem, Geoffrey Rush, Brenton Thwaites, Kaya Scodelario

Plot: Captain Jack Sparrow finds the winds of ill-fortune blowing even more strongly when deadly ghost pirates led by his old nemesis, the terrifying Captain Salazar, escape from the Devil’s Triangle, determined to kill every pirate at sea…including him. Captain Jack’s only hope of survival lies in seeking out the legendary Trident of Poseidon, a powerful artifact that bestows upon its possessor total control over the seas. (IMDB.com).

Rating: 4/10

Overall: Like most POC films post-The Curse of the Black Pearl, this fifth film in the franchise fell far short. I can’t say that my expectations were very high, but I definitely hoped to be proven wrong. Admittedly, I have not seen the fourth film, but at this point in these films, I don’t really think it’s necessary either. I think the greatest part of the film (aside from Johnny Depp’s revival of Jack Sparrow’s quirky character and humor) was Bardem’s portrayal of Captain Salazar. I think the creation of that character was beautifully done – I just wish there was something more to him in the film. I liked that they gave some of his background to allow the viewer to build some empathy for him, but at the same time, I think there were still some gaps in the plot and character development. I also found this film to be incredibly anti-climatic, which is very disappointing. Sure, there’s lot of action sequences, but essentially nothing that really gives you the punch in the gut you’re hoping for or that adds any substance to the plot. While I think the two young protagonists, Henry Turner and Carina Smyth, offer a youthful and fun-spirited, almost reincarnation of William Turner and Elizabeth Swan from the first film, they just seem like they don’t belong. Henry is trying to avenge the curse put on his father and you have the same for Captain Salazar seeking vengeance on Jack Sparrow for his curse. It just seems like two plots that don’t fit together or sort of clash and make the film fall apart.